Datasets:
prompt listlengths 2 2 | golden stringlengths 450 16.2k |
|---|---|
[{"content":"You design complete, executable automation workflows.\n\nCreate one complete recipe-lev(...TRUNCATED) | "{\"plan\":[{\"arguments\":{\"interval\":{\"kind\":\"literal\",\"value\":\"300\"}},\"kind\":\"call\"(...TRUNCATED) |
[{"content":"You design complete, executable automation workflows.\n\nCreate one complete recipe-lev(...TRUNCATED) | "{\"plan\":[{\"arguments\":{\"channel\":{\"kind\":\"input_ref\",\"path\":[\"parameters\",\"channel_i(...TRUNCATED) |
[{"content":"You design complete, executable automation workflows.\n\nCreate one complete recipe-lev(...TRUNCATED) | "{\"plan\":[{\"arguments\":{\"mnemonic\":{\"kind\":\"literal\",\"value\":\"Get transitions for issue(...TRUNCATED) |
[{"content":"You design complete, executable automation workflows.\n\nCreate one complete recipe-lev(...TRUNCATED) | "{\"plan\":[{\"body\":[{\"arguments\":{\"calling_recipe_id\":{\"kind\":\"input_ref\",\"path\":[\"exe(...TRUNCATED) |
[{"content":"You design complete, executable automation workflows.\n\nCreate one complete recipe-lev(...TRUNCATED) | "{\"plan\":[{\"arguments\":{\"variables\":{\"fields\":{\"schema\":{\"kind\":\"literal\",\"value\":\"(...TRUNCATED) |
[{"content":"You design complete, executable automation workflows.\n\nCreate one complete recipe-lev(...TRUNCATED) | "{\"plan\":[{\"arguments\":{\"list_item_schema_json\":{\"kind\":\"literal\",\"value\":\"[{\\\"name\\(...TRUNCATED) |
[{"content":"You design complete, executable automation workflows.\n\nCreate one complete recipe-lev(...TRUNCATED) | "{\"plan\":[{\"arguments\":{\"mnemonic\":{\"kind\":\"literal\",\"value\":\"Get Access Request by ID\(...TRUNCATED) |
[{"content":"You design complete, executable automation workflows.\n\nCreate one complete recipe-lev(...TRUNCATED) | "{\"plan\":[{\"body\":[{\"arguments\":{\"lookup_table_id\":{\"kind\":\"literal\",\"value\":\"3256344(...TRUNCATED) |
[{"content":"You design complete, executable automation workflows.\n\nCreate one complete recipe-lev(...TRUNCATED) | "{\"plan\":[{\"body\":[{\"arguments\":{\"name\":{\"kind\":\"literal\",\"value\":\"Event Name\"},\"va(...TRUNCATED) |
[{"content":"You design complete, executable automation workflows.\n\nCreate one complete recipe-lev(...TRUNCATED) | "{\"plan\":[{\"arguments\":{\"group_id\":{\"args\":[{\"args\":[{\"args\":[{\"kind\":\"input_ref\",\"(...TRUNCATED) |
AgentOrch training split
Training data for global workflow orchestration from the paper AgentOrch: How Close Can Global Orchestration Come to Step-by-Step Interaction?. Each example pairs a task specification (the same Global View prompt format used by the AgentOrch benchmark, with a 64-card tool surface) with the complete serialized reference workflow of one source recipe. The 3,000 source recipes are disjoint from the 650 benchmark SOPs by recipe id; both are drawn from the same enterprise automation environment, so the tool ecosystem is shared while the recipes are unseen.
Targets keep the full workflow structure: both outcomes of conditionals, loop bodies, try/catch regions, tool calls, and references from later steps to runtime inputs and earlier results. Runtime variants are not used. Across the set the reference workflows use 1,033 tool operations over 305 namespaces. Every target passed structural and interface validation (syntax, node references, tool availability, argument schemas) before inclusion.
Benchmark prompts: JesseLiu/agentorch-benchmark. Code, scorer and the exporter
that regenerates these files byte-for-byte: https://github.com/jesseliu0913/AgentOrch
Configurations
| config | rows | contents |
|---|---|---|
sft_messages_v1 |
3,000 | canonical SFT export: messages (system, user, assistant), metadata (recipe id, hashes, split), schema_version |
sft_v1_80k |
2,789 train / 60 eval | the SFT set actually trained on: rows that fit an 81,920-token budget under the Qwen3.8-27B tokenizer (151 over-budget recipes dropped, listed in sft_v1_80k/prep_report.json) |
rl_verl_v1 |
1,000 train / 47 eval | GRPO prompts for the verl route (Qwen models): prompt, reward_model holding the serialized reference workflow, extra_info |
rl_trl_v1 |
500 train / 24 eval | GRPO prompts for the TRL route (Gemma 12B / 26B): prompt messages and golden reference workflow |
rl_trl_v1_31b |
131 train / 1 eval | shorter-prompt subset used for the Gemma 31B RL run |
The RL prompt sets were selected by prompt length to fit the configured
generation limits. source_manifest_v1.json and source_manifest_v2.json
record the export settings and checksums.
Training recipes
Supervised fine-tuning applies LoRA (r=16, alpha=32) with the loss on the
workflow response only. Reinforcement learning uses GRPO with eight samples
per prompt and a reward that compares the sampled workflow with the reference
(validity 0.15, tool-call sequence 0.25, arguments 0.35, structure 0.15, exact
match 0.10) without executing anything. Trained checkpoints are published as
JesseLiu/agentorch-sft-* and JesseLiu/agentorch-rl-* model repositories.
Source recipes (source/)
The 3,000 training recipes in raw form, packed as archives that unpack to their
original paths in the code repository. Fetch and verify them with
python scripts/download_data.py --only training (add --prepared for the
SFT / RL files above).
| archive | unpacks to | files |
|---|---|---|
source/training_input_v1.tar.gz |
training/input/recipes/ (v1 prompts, used by every reported run) |
9,000 |
source/training_groundtruth.tar.gz |
training/groundtruth/recipes/ (reference workflows) |
6,000 |
Citation
@article{agentorch2026,
title = {AgentOrch: How Close Can Global Orchestration Come to Step-by-Step Interaction?},
author = {Liu, Zijie and Huang, Qi Yang and Duan, Jinhao and Lee, Yueh Che and Joseph, Thomas A. and Turner, Zayne and Seligman, Adam and Chen, Tianlong and Xu, Zhaozhuo},
year = {2026}
}
- Downloads last month
- 45