Split (2)

train · 9.79k rows

text stringlengths 5.22k 5.69k	response stringclasses 11 values
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El Departamento de Estado inicia un fondo multimillonario para organizaciones y gobiernos socios para combatir el tráfico humano durante COVID-19. Estados Unidos está comprometido a ayudar a las víctimas de la trata de personas. https://t.co/jC7YbmxTG3 https://t.co/PNaIiOJyXa	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: .@Li_Baorong La solidaridad y la cooperación son las armas más poderosas: "Reflexiones sobre la práctica antiepidémica de China para el mundo (III)" https://t.co/WpFBMgqjSd	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: En tiempos de crisis, el “sálvese quien pueda” no es la opción. La solidaridad sí! Y la comunidad chino-panameña a lo largo y ancho del país le ha dicho presente. Felicidades. https://t.co/cz7DdKbDSR https://t.co/22lJSfuVJg	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #Zajárova: La situación generada en el mundo por la pandemia de #COVID19 pone a dura prueba el humanitarismo, la capacidad y la disposición de los Estados a actuar con responsabilidad y solidaridad en medio de nuevos desafíos globales que ignoran las fronteras nacionales https://t.co/b5kRNWtwmf	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: En enero de 2019 Maduro reclamó ilegalmente la presidencia de Venezuela. Desde entonces, ha desmantelado las instituciones democráticas y la economía mediante el abuso del poder estatal y mediante alianzas con naciones como Cuba, Rusia, Irán y China. https://t.co/Nh5XPWRGoe	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: .@SecPompeo: Estados Unidos ha liderado el esfuerzo global para combatir COVID-19, asignando más de $10 mil millones para respuesta internacional, desde financiamiento para investigación de vacunas hasta esfuerzos de preparación y ayuda humanitaria. https://t.co/a1lPJUPDGQ	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: La conferencia contará con la presencia de los representantes 🧑‍🔬 del Centro Gamaleya y del Fondo Ruso de Inversión Directa, responsables del desarrollo y producción de la #vacuna, así como de representantes de países y socios de #AméricaLatina 🌎 [2/3]	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: EE. UU. sanciona a compañía petrolera rusa y a aerolínea estatal venezolana 👉https://t.co/qnNjTmbHey https://t.co/RxoRtcpeyz	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Cargos del @TheJusticeDept exponen los esfuerzos del régimen narcoterrorista de Maduro de reclutar agentes de Hezbolá y Hamas para respaldar los ataques del régimen contra los intereses de EE.UU. El fin del régimen ilegítimo es clave para la paz y seguridad de nuestro hemisferio. https://t.co/QrPM3j7jCb	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: 🔴 #endirecto \| Jornada 2 Seminario: El futuro de Europa tras la crisis de la #COVID19: situación actual, perspectivas y políticas clave para España 🇪🇸 https://t.co/wjWcXp64yx	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Desafíos y compensaciones de hacer negocios con China https://t.co/vI3TejmyOt	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Agradezco la entrevista con @dialogo21 hoy: la #UE reorientará parte de su cooperación con #ElSalvador para atender la emergencia #COVID19SV, cuyas medidas deben ser el resultado de la acción coordinada y consenso de todos los sectores del país #StrongerTogether https://t.co/04fEH7qCGz	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: La Respuesta Global al #coronavirus ya está en marcha. Las donaciones de gobiernos, sector privado, filántropos y los ciudadanos irán destinados a 3 áreas prioritarias: diagnóstico, tratamientos y prevención. #UnitedAgainstCoronavirus #GlobalResponse https://t.co/SVBkouNzH8 https://t.co/ROPM6cKbSp	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: La dictadura actúa en oscuridad, sembrando pruebas y cargos falsos, intimidando a inocentes. El pueblo de #Venezuela exige que liberen a todos los presos políticos. Hoy Roberto Marrero cumple 1 año desde su secuestro y la gente le demuestra su apoyo #21Mar https://t.co/XlbA2whtbR	1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: ¡El paquete #EquipoEuropa es solidaridad en acción! La Unión Europea 🇪🇺 y sus Estados Miembros unieron fuerzas para apoyar a países socios en la lucha contra el #coronavirus. 🌎 Conoce más ➡️ https://t.co/cB79Kb3VOL #EUSolidarity #StrongerTogether 🇪🇺🤝 https://t.co/Q6JSIMr1vw	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: ¿Sabías que en #EEUU cada mes de marzo se celebra el #WomenHistoryMonth? Es un mes dedicado a homenajear y reconocer las numerosas contribuciones que han hecho las mujeres a la historia, sociedad y cultura de Estados Unidos. https://t.co/fxfzwA0nEy	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Embajadora Stella Zervoudaki: ““La UE está comprometida primero con sus socios y segundo con el sistema multilateral para mitigar el efecto de la crisis. La resolución de la OMS adoptada por consenso es un logro importante para un respuesta común y basada en la transparencia.” https://t.co/AYhvJ19upy	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Absolutamente repudiable la decisión de los tribunales del Reino Unido de reconocer a Guaidó como Presidente de Venezuela, en el caso relativo al oro venezolano que está en el Banco de Inglaterra. Es un vulgar robo. ¿Cuánto del oro le ofrecieron al juez? https://t.co/51jXxjxbz6	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: China también defiende el legítimo derecho del pueblo cubano a la independencia, la seguridad y el desarrollo. #China #Cuba https://t.co/KURKSrfE0s	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Medicinas, insumos médicos, piezas de repuesto y componentes para productos sanitarios en Venezuela, o a personas de terceros países que compran específicamente para reventa a Venezuela quedan excluidos de las sanciones estadounidenses. Para que sepan @NicolasMaduro @jaarreaza	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El precio a pagar en términos de cohesión social y desigualdad en el mundo va a ser muy grande. Hemos de ser conscientes que la crisis del #COVID19 no ha terminado y que nos exige ser vigilantes. @UIMP https://t.co/bK00Y5NUHw https://t.co/cXesyFrdaA	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: 70 años después de la Declaración Schuman, el proyecto de la UE 🇪🇺 sigue más vigente que nunca y ha sido algo beneficioso para todos. Aquí les compartimos el mensaje de Plácido Vigo, Embajador de 🇮🇹 @ItalyinVEN en Venezuela 🇻🇪. #DíaDeEuropa https://t.co/LBJIAP6TCS	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Europa se enfrenta a múltiples desafíos. La @EU_Commission🇪🇺 está iniciando una amplia discusión para lograr avances. En el #DíaMundialdelaJusticiaSocial apoyamos el mensaje de la @ONU_es para cerrar la brecha de desigualdades y lograr la justicia social: https://t.co/XXmoNhRo3g https://t.co/Eg3bwAUn3r	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: 📰 Les invitamos a leer un articulo de @GonAragones "La vida sigue casi igual en #Rusia 🇷🇺 pese al #coronavirus 🦠" publicado en @LaVanguardia https://t.co/AYKzl4uioJ	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: ÚLTIMA HORA: Moscú protesta ante Países Bajos tras detectar equipos de espionaje en el auto del agregado militar ruso en La Haya https://t.co/S6NTX2N8C9 https://t.co/IC9jn5Y1Xu	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: 🇷🇺🇺🇸📞El Ministro de Asuntos Exteriores de Rusia S.#Lavrov y el Secretario de Estado de EEUU M.Pompeo discutieron los preparativos para la reunión de los cinco miembros permanentes del CS-ONU,que fue sugerido por Rusia. Examinaron cuestiones relativas a ciertas regiones del mundo https://t.co/cXTI1516Cv	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Hace 191 años el Padre Bolívar emitió la proclama antiimperialista más profética de todos los tiempos. En una carta escrita desde Guayaquil, nos advirtió la gran amenaza que representa hoy el imperio de los EE.UU. contra la unidad y la independencia de los pueblos de América. https://t.co/jPDSdUbVvA	1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: (1/5)"China trabaja sobre el concepto de una comunidad compartida para toda la humanidad. #Ecuador es un socio y un hermano de China en Latinoamérica; realizamos la 1era donación e intercambios de conocimientos científicos. En un futuro cercano ofrecerá más ayuda".	3 loaded language
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: invitamos a los professionales de la comunicacion en #Venezuela a participar en este taller organizado por @UEenVenezuela para sensibilizarnos sobre la importancia de incorporar la perspectiva de genero en la elaboracion de noticias. https://t.co/4bj3hVGGPo	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: EL PAcCTO lanza el Canal COVID para intercambiar información entre Europa y Latinoamérica. El objetivo es que las fuerzas de seguridad, de justicia y autoridades encargadas de los sistemas penitenciarios puedan compartir experiencias sobre cómo afrontar la crisis sanitaria. https://t.co/EY6J9tmWOF	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Información sobre COVID-19 https://t.co/rXMLX39PyC	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Nadie es inmune a la pandemia por #coronavirus y ninguno de nosotros puede vencer al virus solo.🚫 Si podemos desarrollar una vacuna💉 producida por el mundo, para todo el mundo🌎, será un bien público mundial único del siglo XXI. Este es el mundo unido contra el #COVID19. https://t.co/ADfuL7tnSQ	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: "Me encanta la ironía de la administración Trump, presionando para extender el embargo de armas a Irán mientras nombra a alguien (Elliott Abrams) para liderar la política de Irán, que participó en la venta ilegal de armas a Irán" https://t.co/pXvz2ppZnx	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Durante la Reunión Informal de Ministros de Asuntos Exteriores de la UE #Gymnich, evaluamos la situación de #Bielorrusia y la respuesta de la UE. El diálogo nacional es la única forma de que se respeten la democracia y las libertades fundamentales en el país. https://t.co/wSlkFUJIC9	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Las vacunas han ayudado a controlar muchas enfermedades mortales. Los científicos en búsqueda de la vacuna de #COVID19 están aprovechando los esfuerzos constantes de EE.UU. para limitar el impacto de las enfermedades infecciosas en todo el mundo. https://t.co/u0N5QWFrPC	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El @StateDept y el @Southcom usan una vez más al centro de pensamiento de la OTAN (@AtlanticCouncil) para difundir su desinformación y mitos sobre Venezuela y criminalizar las acciones de un país que busca subvertir el bloque criminal contra su pueblo. #ACVenezuela	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Josep Borrell, jefe de la @UEGuatemala reprobó este miércoles la decisión de Estados Unidos de suspender su contribución a la Organización Mundial de la Salud #OMS, en plena alerta sanitaria mundial por el nuevo coronavirus. Vía: @AreliTGW https://t.co/deGRw80UWr	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: .@SecPompeo: Sabemos que el Partido Comunista Chino no ha sido franco. Sabemos que cuando hubo médicos que informaron esto, no pudieron hablar. Sabemos que echaron a los periodistas estadounidenses. Sabemos que han tratado de ocultar esto. https://t.co/DSIPNCXX7t	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Las rutas comerciales de China son milenarias: en el 200 a. C. la dinastía Han comerciaba con Occidente a través de un itinerario que iba desde el mar de China hasta Bretaña, desde el Cáucaso hasta el norte de África y el sur de Asia. Luego fue bautizado como la Ruta de la Seda. https://t.co/x97CfJoXgV	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Todos tenemos la esperanza de encontrar pronto una vacuna contra el COVID-19. Sin embargo, este video explica porque las vacunas deben ser también seguras, siguiendo los estándares científicos aceptados. https://t.co/0yTwMCGwi2	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El regreso de Valeria Guerrero: una cadena de solidaridad entre Rusia y Colombia. ¡Es una muestra más de la solidaridad que hay entre los pueblos de Rusia y Latinoamérica! https://t.co/k0Gg18zGRY	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Celebramos 70 años de solidaridad europea. Una mano amiga para reconstruir un continente desde las cenizas de la II Guerra Mundial y crear prosperidad. Hoy se necesita la misma solidaridad para salvar vidas y construir un futuro verde y digital Larga vida a Europa🇪🇺#DiaDeEuropa https://t.co/XFAFjh1OT8	1 appeal to commonality 3 loaded language
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Se incendia El USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD-6), un barco de asalto y el tercer barco de la Armada de Estados Unidos, que además tenía como tarea, amenazar a la República Bolivariana de Venezuela y a países del Caribe. Agredir a Venezuela es quemarse. https://t.co/BOnEnCNDHD	1 appeal to commonality
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: (1/4)Nuestro Embajador Chen Guoyou, expresó que este año se celebra el 20 aniversario del establecimiento del mecanismo de consulta política y cooperación entre #China y la Comunidad Andina; por lo que mostró su aprecio por el trabajo noble que realiza el @Parlandino en la zona👇	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: 2/2 En su carta, los propios senadores de EEUU echan por tierra el falso argumento de la administración Trump sobre supuestas excepciones a bienes humanitarios. Explican que en la práctica los proveedores de salud evitan toda relación con Irán y Venezuela por temor a sanciones. https://t.co/OugknaFcnn	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: La piratería no se detiene con el #COVID19. La Misión de Creación de Capacidad de la UE @EUCAPSOM apoya ley contra la piratería actualizada en el Cuerno de África que previene los actos de piratería en la etapa de planificación y protege a los testigos.👇 https://t.co/XHGtXCnwgq https://t.co/yZ2rgnzvwk	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: .@SecPompeo: El régimen en La Habana ha aprovechado la pandemia de #COVID19 para continuar su explotación de los trabajadores médicos cubanos. Vea el vídeo con sus declaraciones aquí 👇 https://t.co/Z4Jc4KBuIX	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El apoyo de #EstadosUnidos a través de SOUTHCOM se mantiene constante porque la lucha contra el #COVID19 continúa. Gracias al almirante Faller por esta y muchas otras donaciones para cuidar a quienes cuidan a los salvadoreños. #SocioConfiable https://t.co/s5kmaroLQh	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Activistas en defensa de los derechos de los migrantes le dicen en la cara a @SpeakerPelosi que “Los demócratas también deportan”; (y también bombardean y dan golpes de Estado y roban nuestros recursos, el imperialismo estadounidense es bipartidista). https://t.co/8Iy7WYhZTS	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: .@SecPompeo habló con @JGuaido para reafirmar el apoyo de EE.UU. a una resolución pacífica a la crisis provocada en #Venezuela. Marco como camino hacia elecciones libres y justas es oportunidad para que pueblo venezolano vuelva a disfrutar de la democracia https://t.co/qVDftma27c https://t.co/0K6UFUveNs	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: "Para mí, la Unión Europea significa la libertad de viajar, trabajar y vivir en otros países de la Unión." 🇧🇬 La pianista búlgara Irina Decheva nos comparte qué significa la UE para ella y la importancia de promover los valores europeos. #MesDeEuropa 🇪🇺 https://t.co/EeaEOOAjaH	1 appeal to commonality
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #COMUNICADO \| Venezuela informa que durante sus labores de patrullaje fue interceptada en el sector Caño Guzmán la embarcación colombiana “Cejal I”, con características delictivas propias del contrabando de combustible, siendo camuflajeadas como una supuesta ayuda humanitaria. https://t.co/iYVkSre2JN	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Embajador Buchan: la Embajada de EE. UU. en Madrid ha proyectado la bandera española en su fachada en solidaridad con el pueblo español por la lucha contra la #COVID19. En estos momentos oscuros, la relación entre #EEUU y #España como socios, amigos y aliados sigue brillando🇺🇸🇪🇸 https://t.co/beXpnEyNAJ	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #COVID19 Informe del #Coronavirus hasta el 23/03/2020 en #China: - 81.691 casos confirmados acumulados (+102) - 5.567 casos confirmados actuales (-366) - 136 casos sospechosos (+47) - 72.848 dados de alta (+459) - 3.276 fallecidos (+9) https://t.co/QXutIhxVN0	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El analista Jon Bateman dice al portal Politico que es posible que las protestas en Estados Unidos se sostengan hasta noviembre https://t.co/tc72vrzMpU	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Un segundo equipo de médicos chinos expertos en #COVID19 partirá mañana de #Shanghai con 9 toneladas de materiales médicos (ventiladores artificiales, monitores y entre otros) donados por #China. El equipo aterrizará en #Milán y apoyará a los médicos locales. #ForzaCinaeItalia https://t.co/ocS7gfyaBv	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El director del laboratorio de virología de #Wuhan, que ha sido centro de teorías conspiratorias, niega los rumores y dice que fabricar un #coronavirus no es humanamente posible. Aquí os dejamos su entrevista completa 👇 #StopBulos https://t.co/hKqLADSbx6	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #EstadosUnidos se preocupa por el pueblo de China. Mientras la República Popular China luchaba contra el #COVID19 a principios de este año, las empresas estadounidenses entraron en acción para proporcionar asistencia y esfuerzos de contención. https://t.co/9DZmjR2b8P	1 appeal to commonality
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Medicinas, insumos médicos, piezas de repuesto y componentes para productos sanitarios en Venezuela, o a personas de terceros países que compran para reventa a Venezuela quedan excluidos de las sanciones estadounidenses. Para más detalles visita: https://t.co/msZ8Id0jMu https://t.co/Dt9I1hCqIO	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #COVID19 Informe del #Coronavirus hasta el 13/03/2020 en #China: - 81.007 casos confirmados acumulados (+11) - 13.588 casos confirmados actuales (-1325) - 147 casos sospechosos (+33) - 64.238 dados de alta (+1329) - 3.181 fallecidos (+7) https://t.co/m4OzeWq9qA	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Primer Ministro Li Keqiang dijo: China es un país en desarrollo con una gran población, el promedio anual del ingreso disponible per cápita roza los 30.000 yuanes RMB, pero todavía hay unos 600 millones de personas de ingreso medio y bajo, solo unos 1000 yuanes por mes.	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Hoy hemos debatido sobre el papel de la UE en un mundo post coronavirus en #CursosVeranoUCM El papel de Europa en el mundo va a depender de la capacidad que tenga de ayudar a otros países. @CursosVeranoUCM @SantanderUni https://t.co/7zU7vFrra3 https://t.co/l8z9IfF5tX	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: EEUU sigue trabajando con amigos y socios en la región, dando respuestas colectivas a la pandemia, y liderando la respuesta global contra COVID-19. Es un esfuerzo de toda la nación, incluyendo gobierno, empresas, ONG y entidades religiosas de ayuda. #COVID19 #AmericaActs https://t.co/OSy6eupaI4	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Hechos contra palabras, nueva sección que estreno en mi cuenta para demostrar la falsedad contenida en el mensaje de la embajadora en funciones de los EEUU en La Habana, dice que el creador concibió a todos los hombres iguales, habla del derecho a la vida. #Cuba #Venezuela https://t.co/y2PFdMy1pg	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: En los últimos meses, Europa ha redoblado sus esfuerzos de solidaridad. El 16 de septiembre, en el discurso de la presidenta @vonderleyen sobre el Estado de la Unión, haremos balance de nuestros logros y analizaremos el futuro de la UE. #SOTEU https://t.co/g73kmi2BKJ https://t.co/VBhV4FrmxQ	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Hoy, conmemoramos 75 años desde el final de la Segunda Guerra Mundial. Debemos recordar sus historias y nuestra historia compartida. ComisiónLa @EU_Commission te invita a dar un paseo juntos por la historia europea → https://t.co/FC8MEDqfum #ThisIsTheEU https://t.co/fCYenyN2nD	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: 📢 China 🇨🇳 considera que Venezuela 🇻🇪 celebre las elecciones de la Asamblea Nacional de conformidad con la Constitución, beneficiará la plena expresión de la opinión del pueblo y el restablecimiento de la normalidad en el país, las cuales deberán ser respetadas y apoyadas. 1/2 https://t.co/QAmoF59edW	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: (1/2) Con la reciente inclusión de las Ruinas Arqueológicas de la Ciudad Liangzhu en la Lista del Patrimonio como un sitio cultural, eleva el número total de sitios de patrimonio en China a 55, el más alto del mundo. https://t.co/zcWIihLsO4	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: ¡Felicitaciones, @_davidreyes! Tu esfuerzo fue clave en este triunfo para las personas con discapacidad en ESA. Me impresiona tu actitud positiva, espíritu de diálogo constructivo y firme apretón de manos (antes de COVID cuando aún se hacía) Eres una inspiración. Dios te bendiga! https://t.co/7sad4aIisq	1 appeal to commonality
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #Comercio \| El presidente chino Xi Jinping, al visitar la sede de investigación y desarrollo del fabricante de automóviles Grupo FAW, manifestó que China debe aspirar a construir fuertes marcas nacionales de automóviles basados en tecnología de punta. 👉https://t.co/LOATyc6Ckp https://t.co/vdjh8wQaEf	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #Zajárova: Las intenciones de #EEUU 🇺🇸 de retirar sus contingentes militares de otros países, en la mayoría de los casos, no se acompañan de pasos prácticos. En #Siria 🇸🇾 el Pentágono mantiene sus unidades y bases militares, pese a las declaraciones de @realDonaldTrump https://t.co/asyOIvFdGK	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: La libertad de expresión tiene límites. La @WHO denominó oficialmente el virus como #COVID19, abogando por evitar referirse a cualquier ubicación geográfica, cultura, población... Le deseamos una pronta recuperación, @Ortega_Smith. #StopRacismo https://t.co/xyxKwNAsoJ	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Agradecidos por la donación de insumos de parte de la República Popular China y su Embajada en Panamá por este gesto de solidaridad con nuestro país. #TodoLoQueNosUne https://t.co/RkUZtcTNI2	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Los Estados Unidos cree firmemente en la dignidad e igualdad de las personas #LGBTI porque los derechos humanos cobijan a todos independientemente de la orientación sexual, identidad de género, o raza. #Pride2020 https://t.co/uAct0Usvjv	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Comunicado Conjunto 🇲🇽🇪🇺 La Unión Europea y sus Estados Miembros son solidarios con México en su lucha contra la pandemia de COVID-19 y sus consecuencias ➡️ https://t.co/Fdj59Rd7AN #TeamEurope #UnidosSomosMásFuertes @SRE_mx https://t.co/5MtmjBHVam	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #Salud ⚕️ \| El Grupo Farmacéutico Nacional de #China 🇨🇳(Sinopharm) publicó los resultados de los ensayos clínicos de una 𝘃𝗮𝗰𝘂𝗻𝗮 contra el #Covid_19. - Estas pruebas muestran resultados prometedores tanto en seguridad como eficacia. Ampliación 👉https://t.co/KYuRrTwQCa https://t.co/Fm4cgA3wZr	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El Tesoro de EEUU establece sanciones contraa Rosneft Trading S.A., empresa petrolera rusa de petróleo por apoyar al régimen ilegítimo de Maduro. #Venezuela https://t.co/Zfj5ZCp1TS	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: -@SecPompeo visitará Paramaribo, Surinam; Georgetown, Guyana; Boa Vista, Brasil; Bogotá, Colombia y Plano, Texas, para resaltar el compromiso de EE.UU. con la defensa de la democracia, la revitalización de nuestras economías y el fortalecimiento de la seguridad en el hemisferio. https://t.co/VrDrXd4j9P	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #UltimoMomento 📸 \|\| Llegó a Caracas el Embajador de #Rusia en #Venezuela Sergey Mélik-Bagdasárov 🇷🇺 🤝🇻🇪 #Diplomacia @mae_rusia https://t.co/Tqk36n4Snn	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #ABCMundo🌏: La presidenta de la Comisión Europea, y el responsable de la diplomacia de la UE, exhortaron a Estados Unidos a que “reconsidere su decisión” de romper los vínculos con la OMS. https://t.co/cMvheEphrJ	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: "Muchos vivimos bajo confinamiento, tanto en Europa como en Latam. Lo que no podemos hacer es poner en cuarentena a la libertad de expresión. Es muy importante que tengamos acceso a fuentes veraces y a la transparencia, para contrastar la información que recibimos" @EUAmbPeru	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: ONU Mujeres participó en reunión entre el petit comité del G13 y @GuatemalaGob sobre seguridad y justicia. «Quiero que Guatemala sea conocido por sus grandes fortalezas y no por sus cifras de violencia contra las mujeres», subrayó durante la cita el Presidente @DrGiammattei. https://t.co/SS9flTtuzG	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #EsNoticia \|\| Más de 208 mil brigadistas de Somos Venezuela están desplegados en batalla contra el COVID-19. Leer más: https://t.co/RXYLaCFLv0 https://t.co/u38f3Xtl2p	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Ningún país del mundo es perfecto. Las deficiencias del sistema d gestión d emergencias d salud pública d China reveladas en el brote # COVID19 deben superarse, pero no deben usarse para negar el sistema político d China. China definitivamente ganará la batalla contra la epidemia https://t.co/YIQzvL5GJU	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #MesDeEuropa 🇪🇺 \| ¿Qué significa la Unión Europea para dos ciudadanos portugueses que residen en México? Catarina Pacheco y Carlos Boto resaltan los valores y principios compartidos por los Estados Miembros de la UE. #Portugal 🇵🇹 https://t.co/jvkBNetMJQ	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Entregué al Sr. Ministro @MiguelVargasM carta de agradecimiento de parte del Consejero de Estado y Ministro de https://t.co/qp1QYc3hJ6. Sr. Wang Yi por la solidaridad con China sobre la situación de la COVID-19. Ofrecí apoyo a nuestro alcance para RD. https://t.co/UskFMoT3l0	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Subsecretario adjunto @StateINL Rich Glenn y #EmbArreaga participaron en encuentro “Centroamérica: desafíos y oportunidades”. #EEUU está comprometido con 🇬🇹 p/contribuir a mejorar la #Prosperidad y #Seguridad p/que todos los guatemaltecos busquen su futuro aquí en su propio país https://t.co/qAdgs839mu	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El 21 de agosto, se celebró con gran éxito“Sinopharm CNBG”: Ceremonia de inauguración del ensayo clínico internacional de fase III de la vacuna inactivada contra la COVID-19 en Argentina. La colaboración de vacuna prometedora sino-argentina benificiará a todo el mundo. https://t.co/uz26Bk0SK5 https://t.co/U3AokJ30T1	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El canciller venezolano, Jorge Arreaza, denunció el 25 de febrero en Ginebra ante el Consejo de Derechos Humanos de Naciones Unidas (#ONU), la pretensión del gobierno de EE. UU. de perseguir a los buques que comercialicen petróleo de #Venezuela. #EEUU https://t.co/hflzlYxVme	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El ministro de Relaciones Exteriores de #Irán, Mohammad Javad Zarif, pide la eliminación de las sanciones estadounidenses cuando el país está luchando contra el nuevo #coronavirus https://t.co/dGdxFHPAsn https://t.co/XT2rK5EX0D	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: @Kassiano_H Primera línea de defensa de una batalla mundial, China está peleando duro y valora como munición de alta potencia toda solidaridad y apoyo internacional.	3 loaded language
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #AsíLoDijo \| Portavoz de la Cancillería de China, Geng Shuang: La posición de China sobre el asunto de Venezuela es consecuente y clara. Siempre nos hemos adherido a la Carta de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas y a las normas fundamentales de las relaciones internacionales https://t.co/MC3YzOSnwV	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: #Zajárova:Una extraña coincidencia:en zonas de presencia ilegal de #EEUU en Siria🇸🇾los terroristas, lejos de ser aniquilados,son estimulados a seguir actuando.Llegan noticias de que los estadounidenses que ocupan la“zona de seguridad”en torno a Al-Tanf adiestran a los yihadistas https://t.co/gUbYC8EQVd	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: 24.06 se celebró la reunión del Emb de Rusia en Cuba Sr Guskov con la Viceministra Primera del Comercio Exter/ Inversión Extran de Cuba Excma Sra Ana Teresita González Fraga Se discutieron los temas actuales de la interacción bilateral, inclusive en la lucha contra la COVID-19 https://t.co/Jn7C6NwYW2	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: 📢 RT: Irán emite orden de arresto contra Trump junto con otras 35 personas, por asesinato del General Soleimani, por cargos de asesinato y terrorismo. https://t.co/b9dQHoCnCc	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: .@SecPompeo: Las contribuciones de China a la lucha contra la pandemia son pequeñas en comparación con el costo que han impuesto al mundo. https://t.co/x92YSKAgeE…	2 discrediting the opponent
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: El subsecretario Biegun se reunió hoy con @Martha_Barcena, embajadora de México en EE.UU. Tras la histórica firma del #USMCA, el Departamento de Estado continúa trabajando duro con México, un socio valioso, para abordar los desafíos económicos, de seguridad y de migración. https://t.co/Vck8PoyqV1	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Si tiene una enfermedad cardíaca, tiene un mayor riesgo al contraer el #Coronavirus. Aprenda cómo puede tomar medidas para protegerse y ayudar a detener la propagación en https://t.co/CTOn1sxYG4 #COVID19 https://t.co/C6iocR1ZmX	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: 2/2 Los fondos se usarán para estudiar la prevalencia del virus en 🇲🇽, aumentar la vigilancia epidemiológica, mejorar la comunicación de riesgo y estudiar movilidad en poblaciones fronterizas. Juntos podemos comprender y responder mejor a la pandemia. 🇺🇸🤝🇲🇽	5 not_propaganda
You are an excellent assistant at categorizing propaganda in tweets. Propaganda is defined as: information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view. You will need to decide which of the following applies to the tweet. It could be one or more of the following. 1. Appeal to commonality. This could be related to the following: - Ad populum: the tweet appeals to the will, the tradition or the history of a community to support an argument. e.g. "The leadership of the #CPC is the choice of history and of the Chinese people." - Flag Waving: the tweet includes hyperbolic praise of a nation, worships a patriotic symbol, exhibits self-praise, or portrays someone as a hero. e.g. "The European Union is the best example, in the history of the world, of conflict resolution." 2. Discrediting the opponent. This could be related to the following: - Name Calling/Labelling: the author refers to someone or something with pejorative labels. e.g. "The #US is the gravest threat to global strategic security and stability" - Undiplomatic Assertiveness/Whataboutism: the tweet vilifies an opponent, depicting their behavior as hostile, hypocritical or immoral, displaying undiplomatic contempt. This technique also includes counteraccusations to deviate the attention from sensitive issues. e.g. "Just another proof that the #MediaFreedom principle is only applied to western or western-paid media. When Euro-NATO governments crack down on #Russian or Russian-language media there's zero reaction from #HumanRights apologists. Bias and double standards" - Scapegoating: the tweet transfers the blame to one person, group or institution. e.g. "What has caused the current difficulties in China-UK relationship? My answer is loud and clear: China has not changed. It is the UK that has changed. The UK side should take full responsibility for the current difficulties." - Propaganda Slinging:the author accuse others of spreading propaganda, disinformation or lies. e.g. "Pompeo has been churning out lies wherever he goes, spreading political virus across the world." - Personal attacks: the author attacks the personal, private background of an opponent. e.g. "He tries to appeal to Christian voters, but his real life is anything but Christian. He is a heavy drinker and a compulsive womanizer." - Fear Appeal: the author either seeks to instill fear in the readers about hypothetical situations that an opponent may provoke or aims to intimidate an opponent by warning about the consequences of their actions. e.g. "We urge the US to stop using the Uighur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 to harm China's interests. Otherwise, China will resolutely fight back, and the US will bear all the consequences." - Absurdity Appeal: the author characterizes the behavior of an opponent or their ideas as absurd, ridiculous or pathetic. e.g. "Joe Biden's response to the H1N1 Swine Flu was pathetic. Joe didnt have a clue!" - Demonization: the author invokes civic hatred towards an opponent, who is presented as an existential threat. e.g. "Concast (@NBCNews) and Fake News @CNN are Chinese puppets who want to do business there. They use USA airwaves to help China. The Enemy of the People!" - Doubt: The author casts doubt on the credibility or honesty of someone. e.g. "Growing doubts over the US government's handling of the #COVID19, e.g. When did the first infection occur in the US? Is the US government hiding something? Why they opt to blame others?" - Reductio ad Hitlerum: the tweets try to persuade an audience to disapprove an action or idea from an opponent by associating it with someone or something that is hated by the audience. e.g. "The CPC has 90 million members, plus their families, the data has at least 270 million. Infringing these elites is directly against the Chinese people. Don't forget Hitler's evil history of persecution and massacres of German Communists and Jews.Stop NEW horrible fascists!" 3. Loaded Language. This mainly concerns hyperbolic language, evocative metaphors and words with strong emotional connotations. For example: "this monumental achievement left a tremendous mark in history!" 4. Appeal to Authority. - Appeal to false authority: Tweet includes a third person or institution to support an idea, message, or behavior for which they should not be considered as a valid expert. e.g. "A voice of a Pakistani student's wife tells real situation about the coronavirus in China. Trust the Chinese Government. No panic!" - Bandwagoning: The author seeks to persuade someone to join a course of action because someone else is doing it. e.g. "Germany took strong action today against Hizballah. We call on #EU member states to follow suit in holding Hizballah accountable." If none of the four categories above apply, respond "false" to indicate it is not propaganda. After thoroughly reading and analyzing the tweet, choose one or more of the above categories, and if none of the four applies, choose option 5: 1 appeal to commonality 2 discrediting the opponent 3 loaded language 4 appeal to authority 5 not propaganda Tweet: Una vez más el Presidente Encargado @jguaido demuestra sus incansables esfuerzos por trabajar para los venezolanos, en este caso para aquellos que están luchando en la primera línea para combatir los efectos del #COVID19 en Venezuela. #HeroesDeLaSalud https://t.co/FK2tX2jxzq	5 not_propaganda

Subsets and Splits

No community queries yet

The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.